Virbhadar Singh(Not Applicable) vs Rajender Kumar(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO — CR.R/503/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397, 401. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010091822024
Filing Number
CR.R/1966/2024
Filing Date
18-Mar-2024
Registration No
CR.R/503/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Virbhadar Singh(Not Applicable)
Adv. Parveen Kumar Chandel
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajender Kumar(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO
-
2.State of HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
In Criminal Revision No. 503/2024, petitioner Virbhadur Singh's case was heard on 6th May 2026 before Judge Rakesh Kainthla, with Legal Aid Counsel representing the petitioner and the Additional Advocate General representing the State of HP. Arguments were heard from both sides and the judgment was reserved for later pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
27-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
09-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
05-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
10-Jan-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
23-Oct-2024
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
06-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
06-Aug-2024
Office Objection
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
18-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/503/2024
In Criminal Revision No. 503/2024, petitioner Virbhadur Singh's case was heard on 6th May 2026 before Judge Rakesh Kainthla, with Legal Aid Counsel representing the petitioner and the Additional Advocate General representing the State of HP. Arguments were heard from both sides and the judgment was reserved for later pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts