SANJEEV KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs ABHISHEK TRIVEDI(Not Applicable) — COPC/171/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010091752026

Filing Number

COPC/7750/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/171/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. H R Bhardwaj,Yash Raj Bhardwaj,Yash Raj Bhardwaj, ,Yash Raj Bhardwaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK TRIVEDI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Sanjeev Kumar's contempt petition after the competent authority agreed to refund recovered ACPS (Accelerated Career Progression Scheme) arrears to the petitioner with immediate effect, as documented in an Office Order dated 08.04.2026. Since the petitioner's representation was duly considered and the relief granted, the court found no further orders necessary and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/171/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Sanjeev Kumar's contempt petition after the competent authority agreed to refund recovered ACPS (Accelerated Career Progression Scheme) arrears to the petitioner with immediate effect, as documented in an Office Order dated 08.04.2026. Since the petitioner's representation was duly considered and the relief granted, the court found no further orders necessary and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case