SUKHDEV(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/153/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010091662026

Filing Number

COPC/7741/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/153/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHDEV(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar,Rakesh Kumar,Rakesh Kumar, ,Rakesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Vinod Kumar Gupta 1123

  2. 2.Maneet Verma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of a petition filed by Sukhdev regarding non-compliance with a previous judgment dated 12.12.2025. The court found that H.R.T.C had complied with the earlier order by making all due and permissible payments to the petitioner, which the petitioner's counsel admitted was correct. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as having no remaining issues to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/153/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of a petition filed by Sukhdev regarding non-compliance with a previous judgment dated 12.12.2025. The court found that H.R.T.C had complied with the earlier order by making all due and permissible payments to the petitioner, which the petitioner's counsel admitted was correct. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as having no remaining issues to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case