SHYAM LAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/203/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010090862026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1399/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/203/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHYAM LAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Hitesh Bali,AG 1123

  2. 2.Shabbir Mohd.(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Hitesh Bali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed FIR No. 106 of 2017 under IPC Section 279 (rash/negligent driving) against Shyam Lal after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement. The court found the offense was minor (not involving moral turpitude or heinous crime), the complainant voluntarily withdrew the case, and conviction chances were remote, making continued prosecution serve no fruitful purpose. The accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed FIR No. 106 of 2017 under IPC Section 279 (rash/negligent driving) against Shyam Lal after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement. The court found the offense was minor (not involving moral turpitude or heinous crime), the complainant voluntarily withdrew the case, and conviction chances were remote, making continued prosecution serve no fruitful purpose. The accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case