ISHAN(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMP/838/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010089342026

Filing Number

CRMP/1391/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/838/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Harish Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP/838/2026 The court allowed Ishan's application to suspend his 5-year imprisonment sentence for NDPS Act violations (possession of 13.10 grams of heroin). The court found the sentence disproportionate under the principle of proportionality—since 250 grams warrants 10 years, possessing 13.10 grams shouldn't warrant 5 years—and noted contradictions in prosecution witness statements. Suspension was granted on condition of ₹1,00,000 personal and surety bonds, fine deposit, and appearance undertakings pending appeal decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/838/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP/838/2026 The court allowed Ishan's application to suspend his 5-year imprisonment sentence for NDPS Act violations (possession of 13.10 grams of heroin). The court found the sentence disproportionate under the principle of proportionality—since 250 grams warrants 10 years, possessing 13.10 grams shouldn't warrant 5 years—and noted contradictions in prosecution witness statements. Suspension was granted on condition of ₹1,00,000 personal and surety bonds, fine deposit, and appearance undertakings pending appeal decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case