SURENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMP/807/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010089322026

Filing Number

CRMP/1389/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/807/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Shyam Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    The court suspended the five-year imprisonment sentences of two co-accused (Ishan and Surinder Kumar) convicted under NDPS Act Sections 21/22 and 29 for possessing 13.10 grams of heroin. The court found the sentences disproportionate under the principle of proportionality, noting that 250 grams is the commercial quantity warranting 10 years imprisonment. Suspension was granted subject to bail bonds of ₹1,00,000 each and deposit of fines, pending appeal hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Pronouncement Of Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/807/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended the five-year imprisonment sentences of two co-accused (Ishan and Surinder Kumar) convicted under NDPS Act Sections 21/22 and 29 for possessing 13.10 grams of heroin. The court found the sentences disproportionate under the principle of proportionality, noting that 250 grams is the commercial quantity warranting 10 years imprisonment. Suspension was granted subject to bail bonds of ₹1,00,000 each and deposit of fines, pending appeal hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case