RAKESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085822026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1346/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/275/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Azmat Hayat Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.Hitender Sharma(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Hem Kanta Kaushal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 129/2019 against Rakesh Kumar and all consequential proceedings after the parties reached a compromise. The court found that since the petitioner and respondent No.2 had settled the matter, continuing the trial would serve no fruitful purpose, justifying the quashing of charges under IPC Sections 279, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 187. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 129/2019 against Rakesh Kumar and all consequential proceedings after the parties reached a compromise. The court found that since the petitioner and respondent No.2 had settled the matter, continuing the trial would serve no fruitful purpose, justifying the quashing of charges under IPC Sections 279, 427 and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185, 187. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case