BHUPENDER SINGH(Not Applicable) vs ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable) — COPC/123/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085192026

Filing Number

COPC/7179/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/123/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPENDER SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur, ,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the contempt petition filed by Bhupender Singh against Aditya Negi, as the petitioner's representation had already been considered and rejected by the government order dated 31.03.2026. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to challenge the consideration order through appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the contempt petition filed by Bhupender Singh against Aditya Negi, as the petitioner's representation had already been considered and rejected by the government order dated 31.03.2026. However, the court reserved liberty for the petitioner to challenge the consideration order through appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case