AVINASH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable) — COPC/161/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085172026

Filing Number

COPC/7177/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/161/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the contempt proceedings (COPC No. 161 of 2026) between Avinash Kumar and Sh. Aditya Negi after noting the consideration order dated 31.03.2026 that was passed pursuant to earlier court directions. While the contempt notice to the respondent was discharged, the court permitted the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies for his remaining grievances, including against the consideration order itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the contempt proceedings (COPC No. 161 of 2026) between Avinash Kumar and Sh. Aditya Negi after noting the consideration order dated 31.03.2026 that was passed pursuant to earlier court directions. While the contempt notice to the respondent was discharged, the court permitted the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedies for his remaining grievances, including against the consideration order itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case