ROHIT KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable) — COPC/160/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085152026

Filing Number

COPC/7175/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/160/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur, ,Harmohan Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Rohit Kumar against Aditya Negi after finding the respondent's explanation to the show cause notice satisfactory and accepting it. The court discharged the notice but granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the respondent's order before the appropriate forum if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Rohit Kumar against Aditya Negi after finding the respondent's explanation to the show cause notice satisfactory and accepting it. The court discharged the notice but granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the respondent's order before the appropriate forum if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case