TAPENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs AMARJEET K SHARMA(Not Applicable) — COPC/165/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085102026

Filing Number

COPC/7170/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/165/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAPENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur, ,Harmohan Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMARJEET K SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the previous judgment had been fully complied with. An Office Order dated 21.04.2026 confirmed that the petitioner (Tapender Kumar) was granted higher pay scale benefits after completing two years of regular service, with the Designated Drawing Officer directed to fix his pay and release arrears as per Finance Department instructions. The petition was closed and disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/165/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the contempt petition after finding that the previous judgment had been fully complied with. An Office Order dated 21.04.2026 confirmed that the petitioner (Tapender Kumar) was granted higher pay scale benefits after completing two years of regular service, with the Designated Drawing Officer directed to fix his pay and release arrears as per Finance Department instructions. The petition was closed and disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case