BALDEV SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs AMARJEET K SHARMA(Not Applicable) — COPC/167/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010085092026
Filing Number
COPC/7169/2026
Filing Date
02-Mar-2026
Registration No
COPC/167/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BALDEV SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur, ,Harmohan Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMARJEET K SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the previous judgment had been duly complied with. An Office Order dated 21.04.2026 confirmed that the petitioner Baldev Sharma was granted higher pay scale benefits after two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of legal remedy in Mohit Sharma's case, with the DDO directed to fix pay and release arrears accordingly. Consequently, no further order was required and the petition was closed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/167/2026
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the previous judgment had been duly complied with. An Office Order dated 21.04.2026 confirmed that the petitioner Baldev Sharma was granted higher pay scale benefits after two years of regular service, subject to the final outcome of legal remedy in Mohit Sharma's case, with the DDO directed to fix pay and release arrears accordingly. Consequently, no further order was required and the petition was closed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts