VIKAS CHANDEL(Not Applicable) vs ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable) — COPC/162/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010085082026

Filing Number

COPC/7168/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

COPC/162/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS CHANDEL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Dutt Gautam,Harmohan Thakur,Harmohan Thakur, ,Harmohan Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA NEGI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the contempt petition as not pressed after the respondent placed on record an office order clarifying that the judgment in Mohit Sharma's case was not applicable to the petitioner and that the petitioner was not entitled to higher pay stage under the Revised Pay Regulations. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the office order through appropriate legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the contempt petition as not pressed after the respondent placed on record an office order clarifying that the judgment in Mohit Sharma's case was not applicable to the petitioner and that the petitioner was not entitled to higher pay stage under the Revised Pay Regulations. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the office order through appropriate legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case