CHANDERSHEKHAR(Not Applicable) vs RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/101/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010080242026

Filing Number

COPC/6728/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

COPC/101/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDERSHEKHAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Dhananjay Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Devesh Kumar(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Amarjeet K. Sharma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the proceedings after the Director School Education issued office instructions (dated 13.04.2026) considering the petitioner's case under an office order dated 10.04.2026. The court discharged notices to respondents but reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances in the future if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the proceedings after the Director School Education issued office instructions (dated 13.04.2026) considering the petitioner's case under an office order dated 10.04.2026. The court discharged notices to respondents but reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for any surviving grievances in the future if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case