BHUPINDER THAKUR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/290/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 31st March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010077892026
Filing Number
CRMPM/1251/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRMPM/290/2026
Registration Date
03-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHUPINDER THAKUR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vikas Rajput
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Bhupinder Thakur's bail petition in an NDPS case involving 3.575 kg of charas (commercial quantity). The court held that for commercial quantity drug offences, Section 37 of the NDPS Act mandates two conditions: reasonable grounds must exist to believe the accused is not guilty AND he is not likely to commit offences while on bail. Since the petitioner failed to satisfy these twin cumulative conditions and was prima facie connected to the contraband, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMPM/290/2026
Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Bhupinder Thakur's bail petition in an NDPS case involving 3.575 kg of charas (commercial quantity). The court held that for commercial quantity drug offences, Section 37 of the NDPS Act mandates two conditions: reasonable grounds must exist to believe the accused is not guilty AND he is not likely to commit offences while on bail. Since the petitioner failed to satisfy these twin cumulative conditions and was prima facie connected to the contraband, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts