NARENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/126/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010076972026

Filing Number

CRMMO/1239/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/126/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Chander Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Balwinder Singh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Govind Kumar(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Anshul(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMMO 126/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 0187 of 2025 under Sections 281 & 125(a) BNS against petitioner Narender Kumar and acquitted him of all charges. The court found the offences were petty traffic violations without moral turpitude, the complainant and injured parties had voluntarily settled the matter through compromise, conviction prospects were remote, and continuing proceedings served no fruitful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/126/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMMO 126/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 0187 of 2025 under Sections 281 & 125(a) BNS against petitioner Narender Kumar and acquitted him of all charges. The court found the offences were petty traffic violations without moral turpitude, the complainant and injured parties had voluntarily settled the matter through compromise, conviction prospects were remote, and continuing proceedings served no fruitful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case