GIAN SINGH(Not Applicable) vs State of Himachal Pradesh through its Secretary (Jal Shakti)(Not Applicable) — CWP/3868/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010073572026

Filing Number

CWP/6160/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3868/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIAN SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinay Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Himachal Pradesh through its Secretary (Jal Shakti)(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Engineer-in-Chief Jal Shakti Vibhag(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Executive Engineer Jal Shakti Division Shillai(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Jal Shakti Sub-Division Ronhat(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation within twelve weeks. The court did not adjudicate the underlying merits but instead mandated timely consideration of the representation by the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3868/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation within twelve weeks. The court did not adjudicate the underlying merits but instead mandated timely consideration of the representation by the appropriate administrative authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case