SUDERSHAN KUMAR AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2155/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010072682022
Filing Number
CWP/5521/2022
Filing Date
23-Mar-2022
Registration No
CWP/2155/2022
Registration Date
07-Apr-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDERSHAN KUMAR AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Subhash Sharma,Prantap Sharma,Prantap Sharma, ,Prantap Sharma,Prantap Sharma
-
2.Asha Devi(Not Applicable)
-
3.Jarnail Singh(Not Applicable)
-
4.Rajinder Singh(Not Applicable)
-
5.Surinder Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
6.Vijay Singh(Not Applicable)
-
7.Ajay Kumari(Not Applicable)
-
8.Surinder Singh(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)
-
2.Director of Higher Education(Not Applicable)
-
3.V.N.M., Sr. Secondary School,(Not Applicable)
Adv. Surinder Kumar Sharma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable under Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that petitioners sought pay protection and arrears from 1993 in this 2022 petition, but had already filed a related application in 2018 without raising these specific reliefs or seeking permission to file a separate claim later. Since the cause of action existed in 2018 but was omitted from that earlier proceeding without court leave, the petitioners were barred from raising it subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
19-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
16-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
05-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
04-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
20-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
18-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
17-Oct-2023
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
06-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
06-Sep-2023
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
19-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
19-Aug-2023
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
24-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
24-Jul-2023
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina, Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
17-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina, Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
21-Jul-2022
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina,hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
21-Jul-2022
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia
-
25-Apr-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF
-
25-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/2155/2022
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable under Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court found that petitioners sought pay protection and arrears from 1993 in this 2022 petition, but had already filed a related application in 2018 without raising these specific reliefs or seeking permission to file a separate claim later. Since the cause of action existed in 2018 but was omitted from that earlier proceeding without court leave, the petitioners were barred from raising it subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts