JAGAT RAM ALIAS JAGAT SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE HRTC AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/3369/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010072082026

Filing Number

CWP/6042/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3369/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGAT RAM ALIAS JAGAT SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Manohar Lal Sharma,Himanshu Kapila,Himanshu Kapila, ,Himanshu Kapila

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE HRTC AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Deepak Sharma 1123

  2. 2.The Regional Manager(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Jagat Ram against the Himachal Road Transport Corporation by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-7) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court did not provide substantive relief but remitted the matter for proper consideration and decision-making by the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3369/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition filed by Jagat Ram against the Himachal Road Transport Corporation by directing the Competent Authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-7) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court did not provide substantive relief but remitted the matter for proper consideration and decision-making by the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case