HARJEET KAUR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3368/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010072072026

Filing Number

CWP/6041/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3368/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARJEET KAUR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Manohar Lal Sharma,Himanshu Kapila,Himanshu Kapila, ,Himanshu Kapila

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director of School Education,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Deputy Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by Harjeet Kaur by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation (Annexure P-8) within 12 weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The court's decision essentially remits the matter back to the administrative authority for a reasoned decision based on the petitioner's averments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3368/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition by Harjeet Kaur by directing the Competent Authority to decide her representation (Annexure P-8) within 12 weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. The court's decision essentially remits the matter back to the administrative authority for a reasoned decision based on the petitioner's averments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case