BHAGWATI DEVI(Not Applicable) vs THE HPTDC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3367/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010072062026

Filing Number

CWP/6040/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3367/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWATI DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Manohar Lal Sharma,Himanshu Kapila,Himanshu Kapila, ,Himanshu Kapila

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE HPTDC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Shivank Singh Panta 1123

  2. 2.Assistant General Manager(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Senior Accounts Officer(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Bhagwati Devi's petition with a direction that the Competent Authority decide her representation (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned order within 6 weeks, in accordance with law. The court remanded the matter for substantive consideration by the appropriate authority rather than deciding it on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of petitioner Bhagwati Devi's petition with a direction that the Competent Authority decide her representation (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned order within 6 weeks, in accordance with law. The court remanded the matter for substantive consideration by the appropriate authority rather than deciding it on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case