ATHARV KAUSHAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010071702026

Filing Number

CRMPM/1159/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/277/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATHARV KAUSHAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Gaurav Kochhar,Bhairav Gupta,Bhairav Gupta, ,Varun Chauhan,Anubhav Chopra,Bhairav Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Atharv Kaushal, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (sexual exploitation on pretext of marriage), despite the serious nature of the offense. The court found that investigation was complete, the accused cooperated with police, and prolonged incarceration without established guilt violated the presumption of innocence principle. Bail was granted on Rs. 2 lakh bond with two sureties and conditions including regular court attendance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Atharv Kaushal, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (sexual exploitation on pretext of marriage), despite the serious nature of the offense. The court found that investigation was complete, the accused cooperated with police, and prolonged incarceration without established guilt violated the presumption of innocence principle. Bail was granted on Rs. 2 lakh bond with two sureties and conditions including regular court attendance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case