ATHARV KAUSHAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM /277/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010071702026
Filing Number
CRMPM /1159/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
CRMPM /277/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATHARV KAUSHAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Gaurav Kochhar,Bhairav Gupta,Bhairav Gupta, ,Varun Chauhan,Anubhav Chopra,Bhairav Gupta
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG,AG 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHARMA
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Orders
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Atharv Kaushal, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (sexual exploitation on pretext of marriage), despite the serious nature of the offense. The court found that investigation was complete, the accused cooperated with police, and prolonged incarceration without established guilt violated the presumption of innocence principle. Bail was granted on Rs. 2 lakh bond with two sureties and conditions including regular court attendance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court granted regular bail to Atharv Kaushal, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (sexual exploitation on pretext of marriage), despite the serious nature of the offense. The court found that investigation was complete, the accused cooperated with police, and prolonged incarceration without established guilt violated the presumption of innocence principle. Bail was granted on Rs. 2 lakh bond with two sureties and conditions including regular court attendance and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts