The Deputy Director ANIMAL HEALTH BREEDING Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra HP(Not Applicable) AG vs Raghubir Singh(Not Applicable) — CWP/2525/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010068012025
e-Filing Number
04-02-2025
Filing Number
CWP/5699/2025
Filing Date
19-Feb-2025
Registration No
CWP/2525/2025
Registration Date
22-Feb-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Deputy Director ANIMAL HEALTH BREEDING Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra HP(Not Applicable) AG
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raghubir Singh(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Richa Sharma,Ranjana Devi,Archana Dutt 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's writ petition challenging a gratuity order issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, in favor of respondent Radhubir Singh. The court found the case's facts and legal issues identical to precedent decisions in Binu Ram and Bindumati cases, and therefore applied the same reasoning to uphold the gratuity payment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
04-Sep-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
21-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
19-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/2525/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's writ petition challenging a gratuity order issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, in favor of respondent Radhubir Singh. The court found the case's facts and legal issues identical to precedent decisions in Binu Ram and Bindumati cases, and therefore applied the same reasoning to uphold the gratuity payment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts