SANDEEP KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs M/S BALWANT SINGH AND COMPANY(Not Applicable) — CR.R/146/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010067412026
Filing Number
CR.R/1098/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
CR.R/146/2026
Registration Date
14-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Servedaman Rathore,Vipin Bhatia,Vipin Bhatia, ,Vipin Bhatia
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S BALWANT SINGH AND COMPANY(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CR.R /146/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sandeep Kumar's criminal revision petition and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found all elements of the offense established: Kumar issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 toward a lawful debt for vegetable purchases, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and he failed to make payment after receiving legal notice. Key Reasoning: The court applied statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act, finding Kumar admitted issuing the cheque and its dishonor but failed to establish a probable defense regarding the debt's existence. Since Kumar did not rebut the presumption through credible evidence despite opportunity, the conviction stood. Kumar was directed to surrender within 15 days to serve his six-month sentence and pay Rs. 2,25,000 compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/146/2026
Case Summary: CR.R /146/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Sandeep Kumar's criminal revision petition and upheld his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found all elements of the offense established: Kumar issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 toward a lawful debt for vegetable purchases, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and he failed to make payment after receiving legal notice. Key Reasoning: The court applied statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act, finding Kumar admitted issuing the cheque and its dishonor but failed to establish a probable defense regarding the debt's existence. Since Kumar did not rebut the presumption through credible evidence despite opportunity, the conviction stood. Kumar was directed to surrender within 15 days to serve his six-month sentence and pay Rs. 2,25,000 compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts