RAN SINGH CHAUHAN(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3343/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010065152026

Filing Number

CWP/5447/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/3343/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAN SINGH CHAUHAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Nandita,Nandita, ,Aanchal Singh,Vivek Thakur,Nandita

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of H.P.(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Commissioner(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Land Acquisition Officer(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Superintending Engineer 12th circle Nahan(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Executive Engineer HPPWD Division Shillai(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Mahinder Singh(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition (CWP No. 3343 of 2026) due to defects in pleadings and missing supporting documents. The court granted permission to re-file the petition afresh with proper particulars and in accordance with law, disposing of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition (CWP No. 3343 of 2026) due to defects in pleadings and missing supporting documents. The court granted permission to re-file the petition afresh with proper particulars and in accordance with law, disposing of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case