VIVEK DOBHAL(Not Applicable) vs POONAM GUPTA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Jyotika Gupta — CR/9/2026

Case under Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5). Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: HPHC010064892026

Filing Number

CR/5425/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

CR/9/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK DOBHAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Bhagwati Chander Verma,Sumit Sharma,Sumit Sharma, ,Mohinder Verma,Sumit Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.POONAM GUPTA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Jyotika Gupta

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Case CR/9/2026 Summary: In Civil Revision No.9 of 2026 (Vivek Dobhal vs. Poonam Gupta), the court adjourned the matter to 20th April 2026. The respondent's counsel was granted two weeks to file a reply to the application, with rejoinder due within one week thereafter. An urgent reminder was issued to lower courts to submit case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case CR/9/2026 Summary: In Civil Revision No.9 of 2026 (Vivek Dobhal vs. Poonam Gupta), the court adjourned the matter to 20th April 2026. The respondent's counsel was granted two weeks to file a reply to the application, with rejoinder due within one week thereafter. An urgent reminder was issued to lower courts to submit case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case