RAMA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/1951/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010063012026

Filing Number

CWP/5261/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

CWP/1951/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Jagjeet Singh Bagga,Dipankar Bagga,Dipankar Bagga, ,Dipankar Bagga

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Additional District Collector(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director of Education (Elementary)(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.SDO (Civil)-cum-Chairman of Selection Committee(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The Deputy Director of Education (Elementary)-cum- Member of the Selection Committee(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.The Block Development Officer(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Block Primary Education Officer(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.The President School Management Committee-cum- member of the Selection Committee(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Ranjna Kumari(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    In Civil Writ Petition No. 1951 of 2026 (Smt. Rama Devi vs State of HP and others), the court adjourned the case for further hearing after six weeks. The court directed the parties to complete their pleadings in the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1951/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Civil Writ Petition No. 1951 of 2026 (Smt. Rama Devi vs State of HP and others), the court adjourned the case for further hearing after six weeks. The court directed the parties to complete their pleadings in the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case