MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable) vs BALDEV KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/432/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010059952026
Filing Number
CMP.M/4993/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
CMP.M/432/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mukul Sood
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALDEV KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
-
2.The State of H.P.(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Director(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia,hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Summary of CMP(M) No. 432/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal challenging a Single Judge order that directed consideration of employee Baldev Kumar's case for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent. The Court found the appeals barred by excessive delay (1 year 151 days) with no sufficient cause for condonation, and upheld the lower court's direction for considering contractual service periods toward pension eligibility, which has received Supreme Court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP.M/432/2026
Summary of CMP(M) No. 432/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal challenging a Single Judge order that directed consideration of employee Baldev Kumar's case for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent. The Court found the appeals barred by excessive delay (1 year 151 days) with no sufficient cause for condonation, and upheld the lower court's direction for considering contractual service periods toward pension eligibility, which has received Supreme Court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts