AMAR SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE HPTDCL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — EX.P./477/2026

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010057172026

Filing Number

EX.P./4740/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

EX.P./477/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMAR SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Om Parkash Goel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE HPTDCL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Maheshwari Sharma 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: EX.P. /477/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Amar Singh's execution petition against H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd after the respondents produced office letters (dated 20.03.2026 & 23.03.2026) confirming that all benefits due to the petitioner under the prior judgment had been released. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek further remedies for any remaining grievances through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./477/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: EX.P. /477/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Amar Singh's execution petition against H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd after the respondents produced office letters (dated 20.03.2026 & 23.03.2026) confirming that all benefits due to the petitioner under the prior judgment had been released. The court reserved liberty for the petitioner to seek further remedies for any remaining grievances through appropriate legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case