LAND ACQUISITON COLLECTOR(Not Applicable) vs LEELA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sanjay Bhardwaj, 1(A) TO 1(E),NEMO,Rajiv Rai — RFA/270/2015
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010056712015
Filing Number
RFA/20123/2015
Filing Date
01-May-2015
Registration No
RFA/270/2015
Registration Date
29-Jul-2015
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
Bench Type
Single
Category
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL ( 15 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAND ACQUISITON COLLECTOR(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG
Respondent(s)
-
1.LEELA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sanjay Bhardwaj, 1(A) TO 1(E),NEMO,Rajiv Rai
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
In RFA No. 270/2015 (LAC v. Brij Lal & others), heard on 6th May 2026, the court adjourned the case for further hearing. At the request of the respondents' counsel, the matter was listed after three weeks. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
01-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
10-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
03-Apr-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2015
Case filed
Registration No. RFA/270/2015
In RFA No. 270/2015 (LAC v. Brij Lal & others), heard on 6th May 2026, the court adjourned the case for further hearing. At the request of the respondents' counsel, the matter was listed after three weeks. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts