SHOMIN DHIMAN(Not Applicable) vs SUDHA DEVI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — COPC/70/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010056522026

Filing Number

COPC/4681/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

COPC/70/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOMIN DHIMAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Abhinav Mohan Goel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHA DEVI AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Dr. Gopal Beri(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Dr. R. K. Sharma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Dr. Shomin Dhiman's petition after the Additional Advocate General confirmed that a previous judgment had been fully complied with, which the petitioner's counsel acknowledged. Finding no further orders necessary, the court closed the matter and dismissed the petition along with any pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Dr. Shomin Dhiman's petition after the Additional Advocate General confirmed that a previous judgment had been fully complied with, which the petitioner's counsel acknowledged. Finding no further orders necessary, the court closed the matter and dismissed the petition along with any pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case