MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable) vs BHARAT BHUSHAN(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/435/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010053972026
Filing Number
CMP.M/4481/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
CMP.M/435/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mukul Sood
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARAT BHUSHAN(Not Applicable)
-
2.State of H.P.(Not Applicable)
-
3.director of Urban Development Department(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia,hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Summary of CMP(M) No. 435/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against the Single Judge's order directing consideration of Bharat Bhushan's case for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent, which allows counting contractual service periods toward qualifying service. The appeal was barred by excessive delay (over 1 year 150 days) with no sufficient cause, and the court upheld the lower court's order as consistent with Supreme Court-approved principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP.M/435/2026
Summary of CMP(M) No. 435/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against the Single Judge's order directing consideration of Bharat Bhushan's case for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent, which allows counting contractual service periods toward qualifying service. The appeal was barred by excessive delay (over 1 year 150 days) with no sufficient cause, and the court upheld the lower court's order as consistent with Supreme Court-approved principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts