MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable) vs HANUMANT(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/429/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010053882026

Filing Number

CMP.M/4472/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

CMP.M/429/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mukul Sood

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMANT(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.The State of h.P.(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Director(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia,hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Summary of CMP(M) No. 429/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against the Single Judge's order directing consideration of Hanumant's case for counting contractual service toward pension eligibility. The court rejected the condonation application due to excessive delay (1 year 145 days) and found no infirmity in the lower court's order, as it aligned with the Supreme Court-approved Sheela Devi precedent allowing regularized contractual employees to count past service for pension purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CMP(M) No. 429/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against the Single Judge's order directing consideration of Hanumant's case for counting contractual service toward pension eligibility. The court rejected the condonation application due to excessive delay (1 year 145 days) and found no infirmity in the lower court's order, as it aligned with the Supreme Court-approved Sheela Devi precedent allowing regularized contractual employees to count past service for pension purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case