MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable) vs DAVINDER PAL SINGH(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/436/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010053872026
Filing Number
CMP.M/4471/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
CMP.M/436/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SHIMLA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mukul Sood
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAVINDER PAL SINGH(Not Applicable)
-
2.State of H.P.(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Director(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia,hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Summary of CMP(M) No. 436 of 2026 The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against orders directing consideration of regularized contractual employees' cases for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent. The court rejected the condonation of delay application (approximately 1 year 152 days) for filing the appeal, finding no sufficient cause, and upheld the lower court's direction to count contractual service periods toward qualifying service for pension eligibility following regularization after nearly 10 years of employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP.M/436/2026
Summary of CMP(M) No. 436 of 2026 The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed Municipal Corporation Shimla's appeal against orders directing consideration of regularized contractual employees' cases for pension benefits based on the Sheela Devi precedent. The court rejected the condonation of delay application (approximately 1 year 152 days) for filing the appeal, finding no sufficient cause, and upheld the lower court's direction to count contractual service periods toward qualifying service for pension eligibility following regularization after nearly 10 years of employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts