Ajay Kumar Chaudhary(Not Applicable) vs State of HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/199/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010053052026

Filing Number

CRMPM/898/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/199/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajay Kumar Chaudhary(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar Suri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of HP(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.ABC(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted bail to Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, accused of rape and related charges under IPC sections 376, 511, 506, and 120B. The court found that since the co-accused (Rakesh Kumar Shah) was already released on bail and both acted in connivance, the petitioner was entitled to bail on parity grounds. The court also noted that investigation was complete, no custody was required, and prior bail conditions showed no witness interference, dismissing prosecution concerns through strict bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/199/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh granted bail to Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, accused of rape and related charges under IPC sections 376, 511, 506, and 120B. The court found that since the co-accused (Rakesh Kumar Shah) was already released on bail and both acted in connivance, the petitioner was entitled to bail on parity grounds. The court also noted that investigation was complete, no custody was required, and prior bail conditions showed no witness interference, dismissing prosecution concerns through strict bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case