RAJINDER SINGH(Not Applicable) B.C.VERMA, ,Pradeep Verma,Hitesh Thakur,Sumit Sharma,Bhagwati Chander Verma vs HARI SINGH(Not Applicable) — RSA/571/2006

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-May-2016

CNR: HPHC010050882006

Filing Number

RSA/60571/2006

Filing Date

20-Dec-2006

Registration No

RSA/571/2006

Registration Date

21-Dec-2006

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJINDER SINGH(Not Applicable) B.C.VERMA, ,Pradeep Verma,Hitesh Thakur,Sumit Sharma,Bhagwati Chander Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARI SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. SHRWAN DOGRA DALIP SHARMA,Mukul Sood,Ram Lal Raj,Ram Kumar,Munish Datwalia,Kiran Kumar 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA 571/2006 Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla Decision Date: 4 May 2026 The High Court dismissed the defendants' appeal and upheld the lower appellate court's decision, holding that a relinquishment deed dated 15.02.1999 executed by defendant No.2 in favor of defendant No.1 regarding ancestral joint family property (17-19 bighas in village Pagog) was invalid. The court found that a karta (family head) cannot execute a relinquishment deed—which constitutes a transfer or gift—without either the consent of other coparceners or legal necessity. Since defendant No.2 merely claimed compensation for excess alienations by another family member (not legal necessity), and no consent was obtained from the plaintiffs (his sons and coparceners), the relinquishment deed was void and did not affect the coparceners' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  4. 05-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  5. 23-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 07-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  7. 07-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  8. 10-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  9. 31-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  10. 26-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  11. 08-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  12. 08-Nov-2023

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  13. 22-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  14. 01-May-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  15. 24-Mar-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  16. 28-Oct-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  17. 22-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  18. 22-Oct-2021

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  19. 27-Aug-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  20. 26-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  21. 29-Jul-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  22. 29-Jul-2021

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  23. 22-Jul-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  24. 03-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF

  25. 05-Dec-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF

  26. 13-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  27. 14-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  28. 22-Aug-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  29. 30-Jul-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  30. 24-Apr-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  31. 09-Mar-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  32. 24-Nov-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  33. 10-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  34. 28-Aug-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  35. 20-Jun-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  36. 09-May-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  37. 14-Dec-2016

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF

  38. 01-Nov-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  39. 20-Sep-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  40. 09-Aug-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  41. 24-May-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  42. 24-May-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 26-Apr-2016

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  44. 27-Dec-2006

    Honourable Mr. Justice V.K. AhujaView PDF

  45. 20-Dec-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/571/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA 571/2006 Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla Decision Date: 4 May 2026 The High Court dismissed the defendants' appeal and upheld the lower appellate court's decision, holding that a relinquishment deed dated 15.02.1999 executed by defendant No.2 in favor of defendant No.1 regarding ancestral joint family property (17-19 bighas in village Pagog) was invalid. The court found that a karta (family head) cannot execute a relinquishment deed—which constitutes a transfer or gift—without either the consent of other coparceners or legal necessity. Since defendant No.2 merely claimed compensation for excess alienations by another family member (not legal necessity), and no consent was obtained from the plaintiffs (his sons and coparceners), the relinquishment deed was void and did not affect the coparceners' rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case