HARPREET SINGH ARORA(Not Applicable) vs BIMLA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Sandeep Sharma — CR.A/403/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010048522025

Filing Number

CR.A/775/2025

Filing Date

23-Jan-2025

Registration No

CR.A/403/2025

Registration Date

21-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARPREET SINGH ARORA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Dheeraj Kumar Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIMLA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Sandeep Sharma

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.A/403/2025 The court adjourned the criminal appeal in Harpreet Singh Arora vs. Bimla Devi on 23.03.2026. The respondent's counsel sought exemption from compliance with a previous court order (dated 25.02.2026) citing the respondent's hospitalization. The court granted one week to comply with the prior order, with a warning that failure to do so will result in police-assisted appearance of the respondent before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 31-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  5. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  7. 23-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.A/403/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.A/403/2025 The court adjourned the criminal appeal in Harpreet Singh Arora vs. Bimla Devi on 23.03.2026. The respondent's counsel sought exemption from compliance with a previous court order (dated 25.02.2026) citing the respondent's hospitalization. The court granted one week to comply with the prior order, with a warning that failure to do so will result in police-assisted appearance of the respondent before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case