MANOHAR LAL AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/1500/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010045292022

Filing Number

CWP/3376/2022

Filing Date

28-Feb-2022

Registration No

CWP/1500/2022

Registration Date

16-Mar-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOHAR LAL AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Subhash Sharma,SAURABH KHANNA,SAURABH KHANNA, ,Ashwani Kaundal,Saurabh Khanna

  2. 2.PREM SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  3. 3.KARTAR SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  4. 4.SUSHIL KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  5. 5.SHIV KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  6. 6.SUSHMA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  7. 7.ANUPAMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  8. 8.ICHHYA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

  9. 9.YODH SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Kaundal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.PUBLIC SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL THORA(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable under Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioners, who had filed an earlier application before the Administrative Tribunal in 2018 seeking pay protection benefits, later filed this writ petition seeking the same reliefs but failed to include them in the original application or seek the court's permission to raise them separately. The court held that since the cause of action existed in 2018 but was omitted from the initial claim without court authorization, the petitioners cannot subsequently pursue these reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 15-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  10. 05-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  11. 05-Sep-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  14. 02-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  16. 20-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  17. 15-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  18. 18-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  19. 17-Oct-2023

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  20. 06-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  21. 06-Sep-2023

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  22. 19-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  23. 19-Aug-2023

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  24. 24-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  25. 24-Jul-2023

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina, Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  26. 17-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina, Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  27. 30-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  28. 21-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina,hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  29. 30-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Sabina,hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  30. 30-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 28-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1500/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable under Order II, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioners, who had filed an earlier application before the Administrative Tribunal in 2018 seeking pay protection benefits, later filed this writ petition seeking the same reliefs but failed to include them in the original application or seek the court's permission to raise them separately. The court held that since the cause of action existed in 2018 but was omitted from the initial claim without court authorization, the petitioners cannot subsequently pursue these reliefs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case