STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) vs JAGTA (now deceased)(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat 1. — RSA/326/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010044532015

Filing Number

RSA/20056/2015

Filing Date

20-Feb-2015

Registration No

RSA/326/2015

Registration Date

07-Jul-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL ( 16 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDERS OF DISTT. JUDGE ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGTA (now deceased)(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat 1.

  2. 2.Rano Devi daughter of late Sh. Jagta(Not Applicable)1.

  3. 3.Om Parkash son of late Sh. Jagta(Not Applicable)1.

  4. 4.Raj Kumar son of late Sh. Jagta(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: State of H.P. v. Jagta (RSA 326/2015) The court allowed applications to impleadle the legal representatives of deceased respondent Jagta (who died 23.10.2020) into the pending appeal, condoning a delay of nearly 5 years. The court found sufficient cause under established Supreme Court precedent, noting appellants in admitted-but-unlisted High Court appeals cannot be expected to monitor respondent mortality during extended dormancy periods. Legal representatives were brought on record as respondents 1(a)-1(c), with abatement set aside, pending filing of amended party memo and power of attorney within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  8. 11-Dec-2015

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF

  9. 11-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Aug-2015

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF

  11. 20-Feb-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/326/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of H.P. v. Jagta (RSA 326/2015) The court allowed applications to impleadle the legal representatives of deceased respondent Jagta (who died 23.10.2020) into the pending appeal, condoning a delay of nearly 5 years. The court found sufficient cause under established Supreme Court precedent, noting appellants in admitted-but-unlisted High Court appeals cannot be expected to monitor respondent mortality during extended dormancy periods. Legal representatives were brought on record as respondents 1(a)-1(c), with abatement set aside, pending filing of amended party memo and power of attorney within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case