NEELAM SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3138/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010037012026
Filing Number
CWP/3117/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
CWP/3138/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NEELAM SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Abhinav Purohit,Saurabh Ahluwalia,Saurabh Ahluwalia, ,Ankita,Saurabh Ahluwalia
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)
-
3.State of Himachal Pradesh,(Not Applicable)
-
4.The Directorate of Health Services,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP No. 3138 of 2026 In Neelam Sharma vs. State of H.P. & others, the petition was adjourned on 23rd March 2026 for consideration on 1st April 2026, to be heard jointly with CWP No. 13797 of 2025. The Additional Advocate General waived service and accepted notice on behalf of the State, noting that no separate reply would be filed as the legal issues are identical to the related petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/3138/2026
Case Summary: CWP No. 3138 of 2026 In Neelam Sharma vs. State of H.P. & others, the petition was adjourned on 23rd March 2026 for consideration on 1st April 2026, to be heard jointly with CWP No. 13797 of 2025. The Additional Advocate General waived service and accepted notice on behalf of the State, noting that no separate reply would be filed as the legal issues are identical to the related petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts