SAHIL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/84/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010032452026

Filing Number

CRMMO/489/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/84/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Skandh Sharma,Amrick Singh,Amrick Singh, ,Amrick Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.SHASHI SAINI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vivek Thakur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Sahil's petition to quash FIR No. 74 of 2025 for offences under BNS Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 333 based on a voluntary compromise between the petitioner and informant Shashi Saini. The court found that the offences were compoundable under BNSS Section 359(1), and relying on binding precedents involving similar Section 452 IPC cases, granted the quashing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Sahil's petition to quash FIR No. 74 of 2025 for offences under BNS Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352, and 333 based on a voluntary compromise between the petitioner and informant Shashi Saini. The court found that the offences were compoundable under BNSS Section 359(1), and relying on binding precedents involving similar Section 452 IPC cases, granted the quashing order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case