PARSHOTAM SINGH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/198/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010030632026

Filing Number

CRMMO/459/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/198/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARSHOTAM SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ranjeeta Meghta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.Ajay Kumar Sharma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 121/2022 under Section 420 IPC against Parshotam Singh after the petitioner and complainant reached a compromise regarding a vehicle sale dispute. The court found the offense to be a petty commercial matter without moral turpitude, conviction chances remote, and both parties settled amicably, making continued prosecution serve no fruitful purpose. The accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/198/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed FIR No. 121/2022 under Section 420 IPC against Parshotam Singh after the petitioner and complainant reached a compromise regarding a vehicle sale dispute. The court found the offense to be a petty commercial matter without moral turpitude, conviction chances remote, and both parties settled amicably, making continued prosecution serve no fruitful purpose. The accused was acquitted of all charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case