PRAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2885/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010028642026

Filing Number

CWP/2436/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

CWP/2885/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Maan Singh

  2. 2.Rajesh Kumar(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Secretary (Revenue)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.National Hydro Project Corporation(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.General Manager, Parbati Hydro-electric Project(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Land Acquisition Collector, Parbati Hydro- electric Project Bihali(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case CWP-2885/2026 Summary: The petition was adjourned on 06.05.2026. Respondent No. 4 was proceeded against ex parte for non-appearance despite valid service of notice. Replies from respondents No. 1, 2, and 5 remain pending; the court granted two weeks for submission, after which the matter will be listed for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2885/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case CWP-2885/2026 Summary: The petition was adjourned on 06.05.2026. Respondent No. 4 was proceeded against ex parte for non-appearance despite valid service of notice. Replies from respondents No. 1, 2, and 5 remain pending; the court granted two weeks for submission, after which the matter will be listed for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case