TILAK RAJ(Not Applicable) vs ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable) Advocate - Hoshiyar Singh Rangra — CR.R/107/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438 & 442. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010026192026
Filing Number
CR.R/406/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
CR.R/107/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TILAK RAJ(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mukesh Sharma,Gurdev Singh,Gurdev Singh, ,Gurdev Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable) Advocate - Hoshiyar Singh Rangra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CR.R/107/2026 - Tilak Raj v. Roshan Lal The High Court of Himachal Pradesh upheld the conviction of Tilak Raj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 1,40,600. The accused had supplied apple boxes to the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque in payment, which was subsequently dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that the cheque was issued merely as security and misused, finding no credible evidence supporting this claim. The conviction and sentence of three months imprisonment with Rs. 1,60,000 compensation were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/107/2026
Case Summary: CR.R/107/2026 - Tilak Raj v. Roshan Lal The High Court of Himachal Pradesh upheld the conviction of Tilak Raj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth Rs. 1,40,600. The accused had supplied apple boxes to the complainant, issued a post-dated cheque in payment, which was subsequently dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that the cheque was issued merely as security and misused, finding no credible evidence supporting this claim. The conviction and sentence of three months imprisonment with Rs. 1,60,000 compensation were upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts