DINESH CHANDER SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010025342026
Filing Number
CRMMO/386/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRMMO/54/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINESH CHANDER SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Prantap Sharma,Pavan Kumar,Pavan Kumar, ,Pavan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition by Dinesh Chander Sharma, quashing the lower court's order that rejected his application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court found the lower court committed a grave error by ignoring that the petitioner had filed a Criminal Revision Petition earlier which remained pending until dismissal on 12.11.2025, providing legitimate explanation for the delayed appeal filing. The court condoned the delay and directed the trial court to hear the appeal on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/54/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed the petition by Dinesh Chander Sharma, quashing the lower court's order that rejected his application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court found the lower court committed a grave error by ignoring that the petitioner had filed a Criminal Revision Petition earlier which remained pending until dismissal on 12.11.2025, providing legitimate explanation for the delayed appeal filing. The court condoned the delay and directed the trial court to hear the appeal on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts