SOHAN LAL(Not Applicable) vs HPSEBL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CMP/4223/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010021242026
Filing Number
CMP/1811/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
CMP/4223/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOHAN LAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.HPSEBL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Case Summary: Sohan Lal vs. HPSEBL and Another (CMP 4223/2026) The court disposed of the execution petition application as the respondent HPSEBL had fully complied with the earlier judgment dated 17.06.2025 by granting the petitioner the directed benefits through an office order dated 29.04.2026, as confirmed by the Supreme Court's directions in SLP 10719-10720 of 2025. Since the court's directions had been implemented, the application for revival became infructuous and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP/4223/2026
Case Summary: Sohan Lal vs. HPSEBL and Another (CMP 4223/2026) The court disposed of the execution petition application as the respondent HPSEBL had fully complied with the earlier judgment dated 17.06.2025 by granting the petitioner the directed benefits through an office order dated 29.04.2026, as confirmed by the Supreme Court's directions in SLP 10719-10720 of 2025. Since the court's directions had been implemented, the application for revival became infructuous and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts