M/S BEVERLEY SINGH(Not Applicable) vs TEJINDER SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Arjun Lal, ,Vidur Kapur,Nitin Thakur,Aakash Thakur — FAO(OS)/1/2026
Case under The High Court of Himachal Pradesh Case Flow Management (High Court) Rules, 2005 Section O7R1. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
CNR: HPHC010014792026
Next Hearing
24th July 2026
Filing Number
FAO(OS)/1253/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
FAO(OS)/1/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S BEVERLEY SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Jyotika Gupta,Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal,Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, ,Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal
Respondent(s)
TEJINDER SINGH(Not Applicable) Advocate - Arjun Lal, ,Vidur Kapur,Nitin Thakur,Aakash Thakur
Piya Singh(Not Applicable)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-02-2026 | NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION |
| 24-07-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 22-05-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 22-04-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 03-03-2026 | NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: M/s Beverley Singh v. Tejinder Singh FAO(OS) No.1 of 2026 (and connected RFA No.52 of 2025) The Court adjourned both appeals to 24.07.2026. The respondents waived service of notice. The Court directed the Single Judge to expeditiously decide defendant No.2's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for plaint rejection, noting that if allowed, the present appeals would become infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M/s Beverley Singh v. Tejinder Singh FAO(OS) No.1 of 2026 (and connected RFA No.52 of 2025) The Court adjourned both appeals to 24.07.2026. The respondents waived service of notice. The Court directed the Single Judge to expeditiously decide defendant No.2's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for plaint rejection, noting that if allowed, the present appeals would become infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts