SUSHMA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P./218/2024

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16-I. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010004412024

Filing Number

EX.P./338/2024

Filing Date

02-Jan-2024

Registration No

EX.P./218/2024

Registration Date

13-Mar-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16-I

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHMA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Roop Lal Chaudhary,H.R.Sidhu,H.R.Sidhu, ,H.R.Sidhu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition and closed the proceedings, noting that a Letters Patent Appeal remains pending before the Division Bench. The court granted the petitioner liberty to seek revival of the petition after the Division Bench's adjudication, if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 26-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 30-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 11-Nov-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  7. 07-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  8. 01-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  9. 01-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  10. 02-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./218/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition and closed the proceedings, noting that a Letters Patent Appeal remains pending before the Division Bench. The court granted the petitioner liberty to seek revival of the petition after the Division Bench's adjudication, if circumstances warrant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case