HARI MOHAN PRASHAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/167/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010003692024

Filing Number

CWP/273/2024

Filing Date

02-Jan-2024

Registration No

CWP/167/2024

Registration Date

03-Jan-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI MOHAN PRASHAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Atharv Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Collector-cum-Deputy Commissioner(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Tehsildar(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Shri Sohan Lal,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Shri Ramesh Chand,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Shri Bhisham Kumar,(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Shri Vijay Kumar(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Status Summary (CWP No.167 of 2024) The case was adjourned with procedural directions. The court ordered fresh service of notices on respondents No. 5-7 within two weeks and directed consequential steps regarding respondent No. 4 (reportedly deceased) within two weeks, failing which the petition shall be listed before the court for appropriate orders. The court also directed the DA and Section Officer to explain the two-year delay in listing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 04-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 04-Jan-2024

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  7. 02-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/167/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary (CWP No.167 of 2024) The case was adjourned with procedural directions. The court ordered fresh service of notices on respondents No. 5-7 within two weeks and directed consequential steps regarding respondent No. 4 (reportedly deceased) within two weeks, failing which the petition shall be listed before the court for appropriate orders. The court also directed the DA and Section Officer to explain the two-year delay in listing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case