YATIN KHODABHAI DESAI (LEUVA PATEL) vs STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SPECIAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SSRD) Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER( — SCA/14778/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 00. Disposed: --56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE on 27th March 2026.
CNR: GJHC240733412025
Filing Number
SCA/31667/2025
Filing Date
08-Oct-2025
Registration No
SCA/14778/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
Bench Type
SINGLE
Category
331-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 ( 331 )
Sub-Category
1308-SJ - LAND LAWS - BOMBAY LAND REVENUE CODE, 1879 - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS ( 1308 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIAL
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YATIN KHODABHAI DESAI (LEUVA PATEL)
Adv. PARTY IN PERSON(
-
2.VIKAS ASHOKBHAI DESAI (LEUVA PATEL) THROUGH POA HOLDER YATIN KHODABHAI DESAI (LEUVA PATEL)
Adv. PARTY IN PERSON(
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH SPECIAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT (SSRD) Advocate - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
2.DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
3.,NOTICE SERVED BY DS(
-
4.RESIDENT ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
5.,NOTICE SERVED BY DS(
-
6.CITY DEPUTY COLLECTOR (EAST), AHMEDABAD, VASANTKUVARBA PARMAR
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
7.,NOTICE SERVED BY DS(
-
8.MAMLATDAR (MANINAGAR), AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
9.,NOTICE SERVED BY DS(
-
10.CIRCLE OFFICER, RAKHIAL, AHMEDABAD
Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER(
-
11.,NOTICE SERVED BY DS(
-
12.STATE OF GUJARAT (DELETED)
Adv. DELETED(
-
13.,.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
07-Apr-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
27-Mar-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the special civil application and directed revenue authorities to correct their records within four weeks. The court found that the petitioners, who purchased land (Final Plot Nos. 170 and 173) via registered sale deed in 2018, were entitled to have Mutation Entry No. 21451 certified in both plots, as a prior District Collector order had already directed this. The court quashed the Additional Collector's letter refusing correction and ordered deletion of erroneous Revenue Entries 23215 and 23216, holding that revenue authorities must give effect to registered sale deeds and cannot reject mutations on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
135-For Orders
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
27-Mar-2026
135-For Orders
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
27-Mar-2026
135-For Orders
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
24-Mar-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
157-Urgent Matter - On The Top Of The Board
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
20-Mar-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
03-Mar-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
19-Jan-2026
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
09-Dec-2025
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
18-Nov-2025
192-Notice & Adjourned Matters
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati
-
03-Nov-2025
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. NanavatiView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. SCA/14778/2025
Summary The Gujarat High Court allowed the special civil application and directed revenue authorities to correct their records within four weeks. The court found that the petitioners, who purchased land (Final Plot Nos. 170 and 173) via registered sale deed in 2018, were entitled to have Mutation Entry No. 21451 certified in both plots, as a prior District Collector order had already directed this. The court quashed the Additional Collector's letter refusing correction and ordered deletion of erroneous Revenue Entries 23215 and 23216, holding that revenue authorities must give effect to registered sale deeds and cannot reject mutations on technical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts